When do rules help, and when do they hinder? The balance between adhering to standards and embracing innovation is critical for success in any organization. Standards ensure safety, consistency, and alignment with values, while innovation drives progress and improvement. However, deviating from standards without purpose or alignment can lead to inefficiency, confusion, and risk. This article explores how to balance these priorities, highlighting how thoughtful changes can enhance outcomes, while biases, negligence, or defiance can create obstacles.
The Purpose of Standards
Standards exist to provide a framework that ensures reliability and cohesion across teams and processes. Far from limiting creativity, they establish a shared foundation upon which innovation can thrive.
However, when individuals or teams deviate from these norms without alignment or communication, it can lead to unintended consequences. Short-term successes achieved by cutting corners may overshadow the long-term risks of inconsistent practices.
Key Questions to Ask Before Deviating:
Does this change align with the organization’s mission and values?
Is there evidence or a clear rationale for the proposed deviation?
Have I communicated the idea effectively to ensure it enhances, rather than disrupts, shared goals?
Normalcy Bias and Negligence: Barriers to Progress
A common challenge in balancing standards and innovation is normalcy bias—the belief that things will always stay the same. This bias fosters complacency, leading to a disregard for potential risks or opportunities for improvement.
Example: A team skips periodic safety checks because no accidents have occurred in the past. While the process seems stable, hidden risks can accumulate, leading to significant issues when the system eventually fails.
Coupled with negligence, normalcy bias can result in a failure to update or mitigate outdated standards. Organizations that assume “things are fine as they are” risk falling behind or facing avoidable crises.
Actionable Tip: Periodically review and reassess standards to ensure they remain relevant, addressing both risks and opportunities for improvement.
Innovation That Aligns with Standards
Doing things differently can drive innovation when approached thoughtfully. Constructive changes respect the foundation of standards while addressing gaps or inefficiencies. Successful deviations are purposeful, evidence-based, and communicated clearly.
Positive Deviation Example: A marketing team introduces a new outreach strategy to target an untapped audience, ensuring it aligns with the company’s branding and compliance requirements.
Problematic Deviation Example: A team skips established cybersecurity updates because “nothing has gone wrong yet,” leaving the organization vulnerable to evolving threats.
A Personal Lesson: When I Defied Standards
During infantry training, I served as the point man on a patrol. My role was to signal the wedge formation—a strategic position ensuring safety and cohesion. Believing I had a better way, I improvised my own signal, ignoring the standard.
The result? Confusion among my team and a simulated ambush during the exercise. This experience taught me a crucial lesson: deviating from standards without proper reasoning or communication creates uncertainty that can jeopardize the mission.
To emphasize the importance of standards, my team leader had me spend an hour reacting to simulated ambushes with 100 pounds of gear, all while shouting commands like “Wedge!” and “React to contact!” The takeaway was clear: standards exist for a reason, and thoughtful alignment, not impulsive defiance, is the key to success.
Addressing Biases and Pitfalls
To support positive change while maintaining accountability, organizations must actively address biases like normalcy bias and overconfidence. These behaviors can lead to poorly considered deviations or missed opportunities for improvement.
Common Biases to Recognize:
Normalcy Bias: Assuming that past stability guarantees future stability, leading to complacency and overlooked risks.
Appeal to Tradition: Believing something is correct simply because “it’s always been done this way.”
Overconfidence Bias: Overestimating personal abilities or intuition, ignoring the value of established processes and evidence.
Practical Steps for Balancing Standards and Innovation
Encourage Open Dialogue: Create opportunities for team members to discuss and propose improvements.
Promote Accountability: Ensure everyone understands their role in maintaining and enhancing standards.
Review Standards Periodically: Reassess protocols to ensure they remain effective and relevant.
Support Evidence-Based Changes: Require data or rationale to support any deviation from existing norms.
Foster Collaboration: Engage stakeholders in discussions to align proposed innovations with organizational goals.
Final Takeaways
Standards and innovation are not opposites—they are complementary forces that, when balanced, drive progress and success. Deviating from standards is not inherently wrong, but doing so without alignment, purpose, or communication often leads to inefficiency and risk.
Key Thought: Doing things differently is powerful when it serves the mission, enhances outcomes, and respects the organization’s values. Avoid the traps of normalcy bias and negligence by questioning assumptions and fostering a culture of thoughtful innovation.
How can you balance respect for standards with a drive for meaningful change in your organization? Reflect on this question as you navigate your role in fostering both stability and progress.
Comments